Abortion is Wrong

"A woman has the right to make a decision about her own body, so if she wants to have her unborn child killed, then that should be her choice."

When I hear these words, I want to "throw up." How can it be anyone's choice to take the life of a human being? For accuracy and truthfulness, I replaced the word abortion with the words "kill her unborn child," but you don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that they mean the same.To begin with, the fetus is not her body. The eyes, heart, brain, lungs, arms and legs of a fetus are not hers. They belong to the fetus. Even the blood type can be different. The DNA is different. She nourishes the fetus. After a baby is born, he/she also cannot survive on his/her own. he/she also requires nourishment or he/she will die. To kill the latter is murder and it is no way lesser then any other murder.

This boggles my mind. The unborn baby is considered just a blob of tissue. It’s as if a cancer was excised.

People are always looking for the easy way out. "Why do I have to be inconvenienced with this pregnancy? Why, I'll just kill my child."Is it any wonder that the killing of over 45 million unborn children is one of the contributing factors to the public's perception that LIFE IS CHEAP. If someone were to ask God, "God, is it OK if I kill my unborn baby?" is God really going to say, "I created your baby, but if you want to kill your child, go ahead"? With the killing of 45 million of God's creations, I feel that God is looking down on us with a sad face, and the devil is looking up with a big smile on his face. Can anyone disagree with this? Who do YOU think is smiling and who do YOU think is sad? You’re going to have to take sides and choose one, because just as sure as I am writing this, there is a battle going on in this country between good and evil, between GOD and satan. I try to get into the minds of the PCKU (Pro Choice To Kill The Unborn) and to think the way that they do, (i.e., the fetus is nothing but a blob of tissue), but no matter how hard I try, I cannot. What manner of people are they? Why can't they see what I see: that the precious unborn, regardless of the stage of development, is God's most magnificent creation? Was I, and all the other Pro-lifers, born with an extra gene, a loving and compassionate gene? Of course not. But then why? Their stock answer seems to be, "I personally think abortions are wrong, but I also believe the woman has to make that choice."Why doesn’t the PCKU use the same logic for all killings (i.e., let a person have the choice to take any life) and not just the life of an unborn baby? Because it doesn't hold water and they would sound "stupid." Why don't women who take drugs make the same argument? "It’s my body, and I have a right to take drugs if I want to." This "own body" argument would not sell. They'd be thrown in jail. Recently in Mumbai, prostitutes tried to use the "own body" argument in court, but the judge threw it out. I guess it only applies when it comes to killing your unborn baby. Figure that one out.

Surely, pro-choicers have access to information of what scientists and physicians, who are specialists in their field, have told us, such as the following:The unborn, of the human species is a highly complex, sentient, functioning individual. This is an established scientific fact. The human unborn does respond to stimuli; this is established beyond any reasonable doubt. Real time ultrasonography, fetoscopy, study of fetal EKG and fetal EEG all have demonstrated the remarkable responsiveness of the human fetus to pain, touch, and sound. Observations of the fetal electrocardiogram and the increase in fetal movements in saline abortions indicate that the fetus experiences pain as he/she dies.

The following was written by medical experts from the Ohio Department of Health: Note that this material was not written by "anti-abortion activists"; it was written by medical experts from the Department of Health.

At 4 weeks -- (6 weeks after the first day of the last normal menstrual period). The heart, now in a tubular form, begins to beat by the 25th day.

At 6 weeks -- Electrical activity begins in the developing brain and nervous system.

At 8 weeks -- Arms, legs, hands, toes and face begin to form. [Recent reliable studies have found that the arms, legs, hands, fingers, feet, toes and face of an unborn child begin to form at 6 weeks gestation. It is also a known fact that when most abortions are done all of the above have already been formed, including a beating heart.]

At 10 weeks -- The heart beat can be detected electronically. The fetus begins small random movements, though they are too slight to be felt yet.[More recent studies have found that unborn children do, indeed, move about in the womb at 6 weeks gestation. We have a description of a baby in a tubal pregnancy (again, 6 weeks, because after that, the tube ruptures). The doctor said he saw the baby swimming around in the sac once a second with a natural swimmers' stroke.]

At 12 weeks -- The fetus is able to swallow and the kidneys are able to make urine. A doctor may be able to tell if it's a boy or a girl. Blood begins to form in the bone marrow.

At 16 weeks -- The fetus can kick and sleep.

20 weeks -- The fetus has been moving for several weeks. Now the woman begins to feel these movements.

28 weeks -- The fetus has lungs that can breathe air. About 9 out of 10 babies born now will survive.

32 weeks -- The fetus can grasp firmly.

38 weeks -- (40 WEEKS after the first day of the last normal menstrual period)The baby has reached full term and is ready to be born.So, how in the world, with the knowledge available to us, can pro-choicers say that they are just blobs of tissue, since the fetus is a human fetus (not animal), and since he/she is a being (dictionaries define "being" as "the state or quality of having existence")?

So even by definition, the fetus is a human being, unless you have the goal to say that the fetus does not exist. Dictionaries define a human being as a person.

If something is alive and you do something to make it cease to exist, the word is "KILL" and there's no way to sugar coat it, no matter how hard you try. THE UNBORN CHILD IS A HUMAN BEING. There is absolutely no doubt about this.

Even if someone were an atheist, you would think that just out of human compassion and decency, they would be appalled at the thought of killing unborn babies. But when you throw in the fact that one of God’s commandments, "THOU SHALT NOT KILL," is broken, then you are all the more perplexed at the mindset of these people.

If there is a more selfish criminal act than this, I don’t know what it could possibly be. A precious, defenseless creation of God, literally butchered. Doesn't it want to make you cry? How could the PCKU condone such atrocities?

God laid down laws for us to follow: the 10 Commandments, one of which is, "THOU SHALT NOT KILL." Surely God with all of His infinite power, would have been able to look into the future and would have seen the aftermath to omit the killing of the unborn. Or let us know in some way, loud and clear, that the unborn was excluded. The fact that God did NOT do this, should tell us that God means what He says, and people should not be trying to look for loopholes in the Bible to countermand the word of God to justify the killing of the unborn and ease their conscience.

Pro-choicers will not accept God's word, "Thou Shalt Not Kill," which means the killing of a human being. To accept it would mean that they have defied God's word and that they are a party to the killing of 45 million unborn babies.

To say that, "Thou Shalt Not Kill" does not include the unborn is the same as saying, God, You have no power, You couldn't look into the future, otherwise You would have put an asterisk after "Thou Shalt Not Kill," to exempt the unborn. This questioning of God's power is an insult and a slap to His face.

HOW GOD MUST LOVE US, HE JUST KEEPS TAKING ONE SLAP AFTER ANOTHER.

JUST KILL THE BABY - THEIR PROBLEM IS SOLVED.

Today's woman will be on the side of issues that do not require them to be inconvenienced. Instead of showing love, by having the baby, and putting him/her up for adoption, they will kill him/her. After all, they just have to fit into their new bathing suit or dress, or a particular job opportunity just came up, so, kill the baby. There are people who want to adopt, and will pay for the prenatal care as well as the entire doctor and hospital bills.

It seems that every time you read the papers or turn on the news these days, a teenager gives birth, kills her baby and disposes of him/her, usually in a dumpster. We are appalled at this. How can they commit such an act? Sure we know that they panic and are not thinking clearly. Still, they are charged with murder, and rightly so. Yet we are not appalled when a woman who is in complete control of her senses had her unborn baby killed and this can be done right up to term with a simple sentence. "Doctor, I can't go through with the delivery; mentally I just can't handle it." And we wonder where these teenagers get the idea that life is so cheap; it's all around them. Can it get any cheaper than the killing of 45 million unborn babies, some of whom, their mothers or friends may have been a part of? So it doesn't take much stretching of the mind to say to oneself, "what's the difference if you kill a baby after he/she is born, or before, since the anatomy and physiology are the same?"

These people who say that a woman has a right to kill her unborn baby because it's her body, also say that they believe in God. I do not believe that they really and truly, and down deep in their hearts believe in God. The two are diametrically opposed. They say it because they think it gives credence to their agenda and to ease their conscience, but they are kidding no one.

Would not a person who really and truly believes in God, and gets pregnant out of wedlock, want to carry the baby to term, as a penance to God for her sin? After the birth, she can give him/her up for adoption if she doesn't want him/her. Why compound her sin by killing her baby, and committing a more grievous sin?

I only mention this, because as I said before, I don't believe these people really believe in God, as they say they do. Would not a married woman, who believes in God as they profess they do, and who is compassionate and full of love, carry the baby to term, give birth and then give him/her up for adoption? This would be true love.

And yet these same pro-choice people are out demonstrating to save a tree or a fish or against the cruelty to animals. All of these things are given a higher priority than the precious life that is in their womb. How could this be? These bleeding heart liberal Democrats, who claim to be for the poor, the downtrodden and the indigent, are nowhere to be found when it comes to putting their money where their mouth is. Why are they not saddened by these butcheries? Surely they have got to know that the fetus is NOT just a blob of tissue. Then why do they say that it is? Are they not playing with a full deck or do they all have IQ’s of turnips? Or has their thinking been permeated by satan? Certainly not by the word of God.

The Abandoned - Unborn Childs

My hair is black, my eyes are brown Mommy,

you'd love having me around It's early yet,

the month is one Though you can't see me yet,

I've just begun One month later,

the month is two I'm still but a part of you

Time is passing the month is three

I'm getting to be someone as you can see

Still so small that I don't have to hide

I'm just a little seed inside

You'll love me mommy,

just wait and see i'm going to make you proud of me....

But seems you don't want to see me,

....I've got a new home now,

the month is seven Mommy didn't want me,

so now I'm in heaven It's so beautiful,

but now I'm gone I have no memory to carry on

If I were still there now the month would be eight

I was murdered by my mommy's own hand

I guess this is too young to understand Good-bye mommy,

the month would be nine I could've been living just fine

Although I'm in heaven, I still have to cry

Because of mommy, I had to die.

The girl-child is discriminated against from the earliest stages of life, through her childhood and into adulthood. In some areas of the world, men outnumber women by 5 in every 100. The reasons for this discrepancy include harmful attitudes and practices, such as female genital mutilation, son preference, early marriage, violence against women, sexual exploitation, sexual abuse, discrimination against girls in food allocation and other practices related to health and well-being. As a result, fewer girls than boys survive into adulthood

Why are actually people killing the girl child or abusing them? I don’t find a single valid reason myself for this attitude towards the girl child. I would like to give a call especially to those mothers who being the woman themselves tolerate this kind of abuse towards there own female child? Some woman, being educated and empowered enough yet desires for a male child and so sometimes kills the female embryos. I question a Mother’s heart who is selfish enough to kill her own child? Some women are even crueler that after giving the birth to their child they leave them abandoned at several places to let them die unmercifully. Killing female embryos is an unacknowledged practice in Indian Society. Everyone knows it’s a crime and against the morals of humanity too. Yet it continues in all the parts of India and no one goes against it.. Every hospital is displaying a board saying that they don’t determine the sex of a embryos, but within there hidden limits they actually continue doing this and couples keep killing the to be girl child. I was so stunned and shocked by the recent incident which came through a news channel to me. The news said that ‘Stray dogs located a baby girl abandoned under mud and leaves in north eastern India and their barking alerted some rescuers.’ How disheartening it sounds? Can a mother’s heart really allow leaving the child in such a manner? The next incident similar to it mentioned ‘A newly born girl was found abandoned near an apartment at west Delhi, barely few hours after her birth, the girl was just 3 hours old.’ Just imagine that helpless child, 3 hours old, why did she didn’t got a chance to be by her mother’s breast? Why is she different from other children, who after 3 hours are in the care and loving arms of her mother? Why was she not able to get the affection of family, care of father? Just because she was a girl or because she was a result of immature relation? She had the same innocent face, those two little eyes and the same desire for her mother, what fault did a mother found in her to leave her unattended in such a manner? At least a mother should always give fight for her child in whatever manner possible. Even if the kid is a result of immature relation and she had to get rid of it, she should be responsible enough to put the kid in safe hands. There are many couple in the country who are childless, who are investing time and lot of money to get a child. Some are taking support of religion, prayers and still not able to get a child. There are that couples who are willing to even adopt a child, but just due to the complication in legal formalities they are not able to get kid. A mother who is not able to accept the child due to the problem in society can even find those couple and leave their child in those safe hands. If not the couples there are several NGO’s developing in the country that could help such a mother. Though no one can give proper affection and care as real mother to a child, still its better option to find NGO’s rather then leaving your child on the road, in jungles and in dustbins. I think the woman and our country need to rise up and join hands for saving girl child. They say a woman is capable of doing lot more then a man and a mother can fight to any degrees for her child. Still why a woman is appearing as so helpless or I rather call it cruel to throw away their child, abandon them?

It’s really a serious question, seeing the ratio of girl child comparative to boy child is on the fall line. Girl child needs the attention of the world, they needs to be taken care of, they needs equal love.

With this write-up I like to call all those people who are not willing to accept their own child and willing to throw away, contact me at

ritu@shayeri.net and We will find the way out, we will talk and give the responsiblity of the child to someone who is really willing to take it. Kids are the gift of God, they are blossom of your gardens, and they are the future of the country. Don’t dump them in such a manner, that they would hate the relation called MOTHER. Love them even if you can’t take their responsibility, you can leave them in safe hands and I guess that won’t be so hard for any mother.

I also encourage supporters from around the world to meet up and join hands to save the girl child or any abandoned child, for which parents are not able to take the responsibility.